X-Git-Url: http://www.privoxy.org/gitweb/?p=privoxy.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=miscutil.c;h=fe19582a959b08a5b25b76fe5a322ba8f16d0a43;hp=5167546d30ef0cbd081c0a13ecc1840ec09546aa;hb=23a960241804eb0d73d845acdfcce0bf0e5ebd9c;hpb=625fe85d139316efcc0cac532a8fd5208486dc88 diff --git a/miscutil.c b/miscutil.c index 5167546d..fe19582a 100644 --- a/miscutil.c +++ b/miscutil.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -const char miscutil_rcs[] = "$Id: miscutil.c,v 1.43 2006/09/23 13:26:38 roro Exp $"; +const char miscutil_rcs[] = "$Id: miscutil.c,v 1.44 2006/11/07 12:46:43 fabiankeil Exp $"; /********************************************************************* * * File : $Source: /cvsroot/ijbswa/current/miscutil.c,v $ @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ const char miscutil_rcs[] = "$Id: miscutil.c,v 1.43 2006/09/23 13:26:38 roro Exp * * Revisions : * $Log: miscutil.c,v $ + * Revision 1.44 2006/11/07 12:46:43 fabiankeil + * Silence compiler warning on NetBSD 3.1. + * * Revision 1.43 2006/09/23 13:26:38 roro * Replace TABs by spaces in source code. * @@ -1081,25 +1084,37 @@ char * make_path(const char * dir, const char * file) long int pick_from_range(long int range) { long int number; -#ifndef HAVE_RANDOM - unsigned int weak_seed; - - weak_seed = (unsigned int)((unsigned int)time(NULL) | (unsigned int)range); - srand(weak_seed); +#ifdef HAVE_RANDOM + number = random() % range + 1; +#elif defined(FEATURE_PTHREAD) + pthread_mutex_lock(&rand_mutex); + number = rand() % (long int)(range + 1); + pthread_mutex_unlock(&rand_mutex); +#else +#ifdef _WIN32 /* - * Some rand implementations aren't that random and return mostly - * lower numbers. Low entropy doesn't matter for the header times, - * but higher "random" factors are prefered. + * On Windows and mingw32 srand() has to be called in every + * rand()-using thread, but can cause crashes if it's not + * mutex protected. + * + * Currently we don't have mutexes for mingw32, and for + * our purpose this cludge is probably preferable to crashes. */ - number = (rand() * 12345) % (long int)(range + 1); - /* Overflows don't matter either, positive numbers do. */ - if(number<0) - { - number*= -1; - } + log_error(LOG_LEVEL_INFO, "No thread-safe PRNG available? Using weak \'randomization\' factor."); + number = (range + GetCurrentThreadId() % range) / 2; #else - number = random() % range + 1; -#endif /* (ifndef HAVE_RANDOM) */ + /* + * XXX: Which platforms reach this and are there + * better options than just using rand() and hoping + * that it's safe? + */ + log_error(LOG_LEVEL_INFO, "No thread-safe PRNG available? Header time randomization might cause " + "crashes, predictable results or even combine these fine options."); + number = rand() % (long int)(range + 1); +#endif /* def _WIN32 */ + +#endif /* (def HAVE_RANDOM) */ + return (number); }