+><DIV
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><H4
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><A
+NAME="FORWARDED-CONNECT-RETRIES"
+></A
+>7.5.4. forwarded-connect-retries</H4
+><P
+></P
+><DIV
+CLASS="VARIABLELIST"
+><DL
+><DT
+>Specifies:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> How often Privoxy retries if a forwarded connection request fails.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Type of value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> <TT
+CLASS="REPLACEABLE"
+><I
+>Number of retries.</I
+></TT
+>
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Default value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+><SPAN
+CLASS="emphasis"
+><I
+CLASS="EMPHASIS"
+>0</I
+></SPAN
+></P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Effect if unset:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> Connections forwarded through other proxies are treated like direct connections and no retry attempts are made.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Notes:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> <TT
+CLASS="REPLACEABLE"
+><I
+>forwarded-connect-retries</I
+></TT
+> is mainly interesting
+ for socks4a connections, where <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+> can't detect why the connections failed.
+ The connection might have failed because of a DNS timeout in which case a retry makes sense,
+ but it might also have failed because the server doesn't exist or isn't reachable. In this
+ case the retry will just delay the appearance of Privoxy's error message.
+ </P
+><P
+> Note that in the context of this option, <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"forwarded connections"</SPAN
+> includes all connections
+ that Privoxy forwards through other proxies. This option is not limited to the HTTP CONNECT method.
+ </P
+><P
+> Only use this option, if you are getting many forwarding related error messages,
+ that go away when you try again manually. Start with a small value and check Privoxy's
+ logfile from time to time, to see how many retries are usually needed.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Examples:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> forwarded-connect-retries 1
+ </P
+></DD
+></DL
+></DIV
+></DIV
+><DIV
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><H4
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><A
+NAME="ACCEPT-INTERCEPTED-REQUESTS"
+></A
+>7.5.5. accept-intercepted-requests</H4
+><P
+></P
+><DIV
+CLASS="VARIABLELIST"
+><DL
+><DT
+>Specifies:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> Whether intercepted requests should be treated as valid.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Type of value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> <TT
+CLASS="REPLACEABLE"
+><I
+>0 or 1</I
+></TT
+>
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Default value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+><SPAN
+CLASS="emphasis"
+><I
+CLASS="EMPHASIS"
+>0</I
+></SPAN
+></P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Effect if unset:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> Only proxy requests are accepted, intercepted requests are treated as invalid.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Notes:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> If you don't trust your clients and want to force them
+ to use <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+>, enable this
+ option and configure your packet filter to redirect outgoing
+ HTTP connections into <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+>.
+ </P
+><P
+> Make sure that <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy's</SPAN
+> own requests
+ aren't redirected as well. Additionally take care that
+ <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+> can't intentionally connect
+ to itself, otherwise you could run into redirection loops if
+ <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy's</SPAN
+> listening port is reachable
+ by the outside or an attacker has access to the pages you visit.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Examples:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> accept-intercepted-requests 1
+ </P
+></DD
+></DL
+></DIV
+></DIV
+><DIV
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><H4
+CLASS="SECT3"
+><A
+NAME="SPLIT-LARGE-FORMS"
+></A
+>7.5.6. split-large-forms</H4
+><P
+></P
+><DIV
+CLASS="VARIABLELIST"
+><DL
+><DT
+>Specifies:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> Whether the CGI interface should stay compatible with broken HTTP clients.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Type of value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> <TT
+CLASS="REPLACEABLE"
+><I
+>0 or 1</I
+></TT
+>
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Default value:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+><SPAN
+CLASS="emphasis"
+><I
+CLASS="EMPHASIS"
+>0</I
+></SPAN
+></P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Effect if unset:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> The CGI form generate long GET URLs.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Notes:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy's</SPAN
+> CGI forms can lead to
+ rather long URLs. This isn't a problem as far as the HTTP
+ standard is concerned, but it can confuse clients with arbitrary
+ URL lenght limitations.
+ </P
+><P
+> Enabling split-large-forms causes <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+>
+ to devide big forms into smaller ones to keep the URL length down.
+ It makes editing a lot less convenient and you can no longer
+ submit all changes at once, but at least it works around this
+ browser bug.
+ </P
+><P
+> If you don't notice any editing problems, there is no reason
+ to enable this option, but if one of the submit buttons appears
+ to be broken, you should give it a try.
+ </P
+></DD
+><DT
+>Examples:</DT
+><DD
+><P
+> split-large-forms 1
+ </P
+></DD
+></DL
+></DIV
+></DIV