><H3
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
-NAME="AEN829"
+NAME="AEN925"
></A
>5.1. I am getting <SPAN
CLASS="QUOTE"
> Early <SPAN
CLASS="APPLICATION"
>Privoxy</SPAN
-> versions (and also
+> 2.x versions (and also
<SPAN
CLASS="APPLICATION"
>Junkbuster</SPAN
><H3
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
-NAME="AEN842"
+NAME="AEN938"
></A
>5.2. I just added a new rule, but the steenkin ad is
still getting through. How?</H3
CLASS="QUOTE"
>"proxy"</SPAN
>
- setting, which will silently enable <SPAN
+ setting, which will silently various protocols, including
+ <SPAN
CLASS="emphasis"
><I
CLASS="EMPHASIS"
>both</I
></SPAN
-> HTTP and FTP
- proxying! So it is possible to accidentally enable FTP proxying in these
- cases. And of course, if this happens, <SPAN
+> HTTP and FTP proxying! So it is possible to
+ accidentally enable FTP proxying in these cases. And of course, if this
+ happens, <SPAN
CLASS="APPLICATION"
>Privoxy</SPAN
->
- will indeed cause problems since it does not know FTP.
+> will indeed cause problems since
+ it does not know FTP. Newer version will give a sane error message if a FTP
+ connection is attempted.
</P
><P
> Will <SPAN