><H3
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
-NAME="AEN1076"
+NAME="AEN1088"
>5.1. I cannot connect to any websites. Or, I am getting
<SPAN
CLASS="QUOTE"
><H3
CLASS="SECT2"
><A
-NAME="AEN1099"
+NAME="AEN1111"
>5.3. I just added a new rule, but the steenkin ad is
still getting through. How?</A
></H3
></TR
></TABLE
></P
+><P
+> Additionally you have to configure your browser to contact
+ <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"127.0.0.1:0"</SPAN
+> directly (instead of through <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+>).</P
+><P
+> To add a proxy exception in <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Mozilla Firefox</SPAN
+>
+ open the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"Preferences"</SPAN
+>, click the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"Settings"</SPAN
+>
+ button located on the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"Network"</SPAN
+> tab in the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"Advanced"</SPAN
+>
+ section, and add <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"127.0.0.1:0"</SPAN
+> in the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"No Proxy for:"</SPAN
+>
+ field.</P
+></DIV
+><DIV
+CLASS="SECT2"
+><H3
+CLASS="SECT2"
+><A
+NAME="SE-LINUX"
+>5.22. I get selinux error messages. How can I fix this?</A
+></H3
+><P
+> Please report the problem to the creator of your selinux policies.</P
+><P
+> The problem is that some selinux policy writers aren't familiar
+ with the application they are trying to <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"secure"</SPAN
+> and
+ thus create policies that make no sense.</P
+><P
+> In <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy's</SPAN
+> case the problem usually
+ is that the policy only allows outgoing connections for certain
+ destination ports (e.g. 80 and 443). While this may cover the
+ standard ports, websites occasionally use other ports as well.
+ This isn't a security problem and therefore <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy's</SPAN
+>
+ default configuration doesn't block these requests.</P
+><P
+> If you really want to block these ports (and don't be able
+ to load websites that don't use standard ports), you should
+ configure Privoxy to block these ports as well, so it doesn't
+ trigger the selinux warnings.</P
+></DIV
+><DIV
+CLASS="SECT2"
+><H3
+CLASS="SECT2"
+><A
+NAME="GENTOO-RICERS"
+>5.23. I compiled <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+> with Gentoo's portage and it appears to be very slow. Why?</A
+></H3
+><P
+> Probably you unintentionally compiled <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+> without threading support
+ in which case requests have to be serialized and only one can be served
+ at the same time.</P
+><P
+> Check your <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"USE"</SPAN
+> flags and make sure they include
+ <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"threads"</SPAN
+>. If they don't, add the flag and rebuild <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+>.</P
+><P
+> If you compiled <SPAN
+CLASS="APPLICATION"
+>Privoxy</SPAN
+> with threading support (on POSIX-based systems),
+ the <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"Conditional #defines"</SPAN
+> section on <A
+HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/show-status"
+TARGET="_top"
+>http://config.privoxy.org/show-status</A
+>
+ will list <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"FEATURE_PTHREAD"</SPAN
+> as <SPAN
+CLASS="QUOTE"
+>"enabled"</SPAN
+>. </P
></DIV
></DIV
><DIV