+<sect2 renderas="sect3" id="blockall">
+<title>How can I remove the <quote>Go There Anyway</quote> link from
+the <emphasis>BLOCKED</emphasis> page?</title>
+<para>
+ There is more than one way to do it (although Perl is not involved).
+</para>
+<para>
+ Editing the BLOCKED template page (see above) may dissuade some users, but
+ this method is easily circumvented. Where you need this level of control, you
+ might want to build &my-app; from source, and disable various features that are
+ available as compile-time options. You should
+ <command>configure</command> the sources as follows:
+</para>
+ <screen>
+ ./configure --disable-toggle --disable-editor --disable-force</screen>
+<para>
+ This will create an executable with hard-coded security features so that
+ &my-app; does not allow easy bypassing of blocked sites, or changing the
+ current configuration via any connected user's web browser.
+</para>
+<para>
+ Finally, all of these features can also be toggled on/off via options in
+ <application>Privoxy's</application> main <ulink
+ url="../user-manual/config.html#ACCESS-CONTROL">config</ulink> file which
+ means you don't have to recompile anything.
+</para>
+</sect2>
+
+</sect1>
+
+<!-- ~ End section ~ -->
+
+
+<!-- ~~~~~ New section ~~~~~ -->
+
+<sect1 id="misc"><title>Miscellaneous</title>
+
+<sect2 renderas="sect3" id="slowsme">
+<title>How much does Privoxy slow my browsing down? This
+has to add extra time to browsing.</title>
+<para>
+ How much of an impact depends on many things, including the CPU of the host
+ system, how aggressive the configuration is, which specific actions are being triggered,
+ the size of the page, the bandwidth of the connection, etc.
+</para>
+<para>
+ Overall, it should not slow you down any in real terms, and may actually help
+ speed things up since ads, banners and other junk are not typically being
+ retrieved and displayed. The actual processing time required by
+ <application>Privoxy</application> itself for each page, is relatively small
+ in the overall scheme of things, and happens very quickly. This is typically
+ more than offset by time saved not downloading and rendering ad images and
+ other junk content (if ad blocking is being used).
+</para>
+
+<para>
+ <quote>Filtering</quote> content via the <literal><ulink
+ url="../user-manual/actions-file.html#FILTER">filter</ulink></literal> or
+ <literal><ulink
+ url="../user-manual/actions-file.html#DEANIMATE-GIFS">deanimate-gifs</ulink></literal>
+ actions may cause a perceived slowdown, since the entire document
+ needs to be buffered before displaying. And on very large documents,
+ filtering may have some measurable impact. How much depends on the page size,
+ the actual definition of the filter(s), etc. See below. Most other actions
+ have little to no impact on speed.
+</para>
+<para>
+ Also, when filtering is enabled but zlib support isn't available, compression
+ is often disabled (see <ulink
+ url="../user-manual/actions-file.html#PREVENT-COMPRESSION">prevent-compression</ulink>).
+ This can have an impact on speed as well, although it's probably smaller than
+ you might think. Again, the page size, etc. will determine how much of an impact.
+</para>
+
+</sect2>
+
+
+<sect2 renderas="sect3" id="loadingtimes"><title>I notice considerable
+delays in page requests. What's wrong?</title>
+<para>
+ If you use any <literal><ulink
+ url="../user-manual/actions-file.html#FILTER">filter</ulink></literal> action,
+ such as filtering banners by size, web-bugs etc, or the <literal><ulink
+ url="../user-manual/actions-file.html#DEANIMATE-GIFS">deanimate-gifs</ulink></literal>
+ action, the entire document must be loaded into memory in order for the filtering
+ mechanism to work, and nothing is sent to the browser during this time.
+</para>
+<para>
+ The loading time typically does not really change much in real numbers, but
+ the feeling is different, because most browsers are able to start rendering
+ incomplete content, giving the user a feeling of "it works". This effect is
+ more noticeable on slower dialup connections. Extremely large documents
+ may have some impact on the time to load the page where there is filtering
+ being done. But overall, the difference should be very minimal. If there is a
+ big impact, then probably some other situation is contributing (like
+ anti-virus software).
+ </para>
+<para>
+ Filtering is automatically disabled for inappropriate MIME types. But note
+ that if the web server mis-reports the MIME type, then content that should
+ not be filtered, could be. <application>Privoxy</application> only knows how
+ to differentiate filterable content because of the MIME type as reported by
+ the server, or because of some configuration setting that enables/disables
+ filtering.
+</para>
+</sect2>
+
+<sect2 renderas="sect3" id="configurl"><title>What are "http://config.privoxy.org/" and
+"http://p.p/"?</title>
+<para>
+ <ulink url="http://config.privoxy.org/">http://config.privoxy.org/</ulink> is the
+ address of <application>Privoxy</application>'s built-in user interface, and
+ <ulink url="http://p.p/">http://p.p/</ulink> is a shortcut for it.
+</para>
+<para>
+ Since <application>Privoxy</application> sits between your web browser and the Internet,
+ it can simply intercept requests for these addresses and answer them with its built-in
+ <quote>web server</quote>.
+</para>
+<para>
+ This also makes for a good test for your browser configuration: If entering the
+ URL <ulink url="http://config.privoxy.org/">http://config.privoxy.org/</ulink>
+ takes you to a page saying <quote>This is Privoxy ...</quote>, everything is OK.
+ If you get a page saying <quote>Privoxy is not working</quote> instead, then
+ your browser didn't use <application>Privoxy</application> for the request,
+ hence it could not be intercepted, and you have accessed the <emphasis>real</emphasis>
+ web site at config.privoxy.org.
+</para>
+<para>
+ Note that config.privoxy.org resolves to a public IP address.
+ If you use config.privoxy.org as ping or traceroute target you will
+ reach the system on the Internet (Privoxy can't intercept ICMP requests).
+ If you want to ping the system Privoxy runs on,
+ you should use its IP address or local DNS name (if it has got one).
+</para>
+
+</sect2>
+
+<!--
+ out of date 09/02/06 HB