From: Fabian Keil Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:11:15 +0000 (+0000) Subject: - Note that the "100% cpu problem" is worth X-Git-Tag: v_3_0_9~52 X-Git-Url: http://www.privoxy.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c58f2c7ac54cb3da81a4829bc79c4fbe2c54b106;p=privoxy.git - Note that the "100% cpu problem" is worth reporting if it happens with a recent release. - Mention the hostname option as a workaround for the "can't get my own hostname" issue. - The profile formerly known as "Adventuresome" is called "Advanced" now. - Some white-space fixes. --- diff --git a/doc/source/faq.sgml b/doc/source/faq.sgml index 50d09235..c41c6df3 100644 --- a/doc/source/faq.sgml +++ b/doc/source/faq.sgml @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ This file belongs into ijbswa.sourceforge.net:/home/groups/i/ij/ijbswa/htdocs/ - $Id: faq.sgml,v 2.40 2008/02/22 05:54:27 markm68k Exp $ + $Id: faq.sgml,v 2.41 2008/06/06 15:32:09 fabiankeil Exp $ Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Privoxy Developers http://www.privoxy.org/ See LICENSE. @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ -$Id: faq.sgml,v 2.40 2008/02/22 05:54:27 markm68k Exp $ +$Id: faq.sgml,v 2.41 2008/06/06 15:32:09 fabiankeil Exp $ In Mac OS X, I dragged the Privoxy folder to the trash in order to - uninstall it. Now the finder tells me I don't have sufficient privileges to + uninstall it. Now the finder tells me I don't have sufficient privileges to empty the trash. Note: This ONLY applies to privoxy 3.0.6 and earlier. - Just dragging the Privoxy folder to the trash is - not enough to delete it. Privoxy supplies an + Just dragging the Privoxy folder to the trash is + not enough to delete it. Privoxy supplies an uninstall.command file that takes care of - these details. Open the trash, drag the uninstall.command - file out of the trash and double-click on it. You will be prompted for + these details. Open the trash, drag the uninstall.command + file out of the trash and double-click on it. You will be prompted for confirmation and the administration password. @@ -2562,6 +2562,10 @@ Why? see if that helps. Make sure whatever name(s) are used for the local system, that they resolve both ways. + + You should also be able to work around the problem with the + hostname option. + @@ -2668,7 +2672,7 @@ Why? is done by the underlying operating system -- not Privoxy itself. Privoxy merely initiates the process and hands it off, and then later reports - whatever the outcome was. And tries to give a coherent message if there seems + whatever the outcome was and tries to give a coherent message if there seems to be a problem. In some cases, this might otherwise be mitigated by the browser itself which might try some work-arounds and alternate approaches (e.g adding www. to the URL). @@ -2699,10 +2703,13 @@ Why? are in the raw HTML source of the page, and the browser just ignores them. But the pattern matching in Privoxy's page filtering mechanism is trying to match against absurdly long strings and this becomes - very CPU-intensive, taking a long, long time to complete. Until a better - solution comes along, disable filtering on these pages, particularly the - js-annoyances and unsolicited-popups - filters. + very CPU-intensive, taking a long, long time to complete. + + + Until a better solution comes along, disable filtering on these pages, + particularly the js-annoyances and + unsolicited-popups filters. If you run into this problem + with a recent &my-app; version, please send a problem report. @@ -2714,7 +2721,8 @@ browsing has slowed to a crawl. What gives? it does not happen. I would suspect some inadvertent interaction of software components such as anti-virus software, spyware protectors, personal firewalls or similar components. Try disabling (or uninstalling) these one - at a time and see if that helps. + at a time and see if that helps. Either way, if you are using a + recent &my-app; version, please report the problem. @@ -2809,6 +2817,11 @@ browsing has slowed to a crawl. What gives? 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA $Log: faq.sgml,v $ +Revision 2.41 2008/06/06 15:32:09 fabiankeil +- Minor rewordings. +- Don't claim that all the old Junkbuster features remain. + Some of them have been removed or replaced with better ones. + Revision 2.40 2008/02/22 05:54:27 markm68k updates for mac os x