<!entity history SYSTEM "history.sgml">
<!entity copyright SYSTEM "copyright.sgml">
<!entity license SYSTEM "license.sgml">
-<!entity p-version "0.0.0">
-<!entity p-status "UNRELEASED">
+<!entity p-version "3.0.2">
+<!entity p-status "STABLE">
<!entity % p-not-stable "INCLUDE">
<!entity % p-stable "IGNORE">
<!entity % p-text "IGNORE"> <!-- define we are not a text only doc -->
This file belongs into
ijbswa.sourceforge.net:/home/groups/i/ij/ijbswa/htdocs/
- $Id: faq.sgml,v 1.61.2.33 2003/06/26 02:57:05 hal9 Exp $
+ $Id: faq.sgml,v 1.61.2.34 2003/06/26 03:00:03 hal9 Exp $
Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Privoxy Developers <developers@privoxy.org>
See LICENSE.
</subscript>
</pubdate>
-<pubdate>$Id: faq.sgml,v 1.61.2.33 2003/06/26 02:57:05 hal9 Exp $</pubdate>
+<pubdate>$Id: faq.sgml,v 1.61.2.34 2003/06/26 03:00:03 hal9 Exp $</pubdate>
<!--
This does not sound very scientific.</title>
<para>
Actually, it's a black art ;-) And yes, it is always possible to have a broad
- rule accidentally block or change something by mistake. There is a good chance
- you may run into such a situation at some point. It is tricky writing rules to
+ rule accidentally block or change something by mistake. You will almost surely
+ run into such situations at some point. It is tricky writing rules to
cover every conceivable possibility, and not occasionally get false positives.
</para>
</sect2>
+<sect2 renderas="sect3">
+<title id="configornot">Will I have to configure <application>Privoxy</application>
+ before I can use it?</title>
+<para>
+ No, not really. The default installation should give you a good starting
+ point, and block <emphasis>most</emphasis> unwanted content.
+</para>
+<para>
+ But you will certainly run into situations where there are false positives,
+ or ads not being blocked that you may not want to see. In these cases, you
+ would certainly benefit by customizing <application>Privoxy's</application>
+ configuration to more closely match your individual situation. And we would
+ encourage you to do this. This is where the real power of
+ <application>Privoxy</application> lies!
+</para>
+
+</sect2>
+
<sect2 renderas="sect3" id="browsers2"><title>My browser does the same things as
<application>Privoxy</application>. Why should I use
<application>Privoxy</application> at all?</title>
Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
$Log: faq.sgml,v $
+Revision 1.61.2.34 2003/06/26 03:00:03 hal9
+Sorry, found another copyright date.
+
Revision 1.61.2.33 2003/06/26 02:57:05 hal9
Fix typo (finally!) and very minor modifications.