1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
5 >Troubleshooting</TITLE
8 CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.79"><LINK
10 TITLE="Privoxy Frequently Asked Questions"
11 HREF="index.html"><LINK
14 HREF="misc.html"><LINK
16 TITLE="Contacting the developers, Bug Reporting and Feature Requests"
17 HREF="contact.html"><LINK
20 HREF="../p_doc.css"><META
21 HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type"
23 charset=ISO-8859-1"></HEAD
34 SUMMARY="Header navigation table"
43 >Privoxy Frequently Asked Questions</TH
80 >5. Troubleshooting</A
88 >5.1. I cannot connect to any websites. Or, I am getting
91 >"connection refused"</SPAN
92 > message with every web page. Why?</A
95 > There are several possibilities:</P
104 > is not running. Solution: verify
108 > is installed correctly, has not crashed, and is indeed running.
112 > logging, and look at the logs to see what they say.</P
116 >Or your browser is configured for a different port than what
120 > is using. Solution: verify that <SPAN
124 and your browser are set to the same port (<TT
131 >Or if using a forwarding rule, you have a configuration problem or a
132 problem with a host in the forwarding chain. Solution: temporarily alter your
133 configuration and take the forwarders out of the equation.</P
137 > Or you have a firewall that is interfering and blocking you. Solution:
138 try disabling or removing the firewall as a simple test.
149 >5.2. Why am I getting a 503 Error (WSAECONNREFUSED) on every page?</A
152 > More than likely this is a problem with your TCP/IP networking. ZoneAlarm has
153 been reported to cause this symptom -- even if not running! The solution is
154 to either fight the ZA configuration, or uninstall ZoneAlarm, and then find
155 something better behaved in its place. Other personal firewall type products
156 may cause similar type problems if not configured correctly.
165 >5.3. I just added a new rule, but the steenkin ad is
166 still getting through. How?</A
169 > If the ad had been displayed before you added its URL, it will probably be
170 held in the browser's cache for some time, so it will be displayed without
171 the need for any request to the server, and <SPAN
175 will not be involved. Flush the browser's caches, and then try again.</P
177 > If this doesn't help, you probably have an error in the rule you
178 applied. Try pasting the full URL of the offending ad into <A
179 HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/show-url-info"
181 >http://config.privoxy.org/show-url-info</A
183 and see if it really matches your new rule. Blocking ads is like blocking
184 spam: a lot of tinkering is required to stay ahead of the game. And
185 remember you need to block the URL of the ad in question, which may be
186 entirely different from the site URL itself. Most ads are hosted on different
187 servers than the main site itself. If you right-click on the ad, you should
188 be able to get all the relevant information you need. Alternately, you can
189 find the correct URL by looking at <SPAN
193 (you may need to enable logging in the main config file if its disabled).</P
195 > Below is a slightly modified real-life log snippet that originates with one
199 > (name of site was changed
200 for this example, the number of requests is real). You can see in this the
201 complexity of what goes into making up this one <SPAN
205 are eight different domains involved here, with thirty two separate URLs
206 requested in all, making up all manner of images, Shockwave Flash,
207 JavaScript, CSS stylesheets, scripts, and other related content. Some of this
208 content is obviously <SPAN
215 Many of the more questionable looking requests, are going to outside domains
216 that seem to be identifying themselves with suspicious looking names, making
217 our job a little easier. <SPAN
224 and BLOCKED) quite a few items in this example, but perhaps missed a few as well.</P
233 >Request: www.example.com/
234 Request: www.example.com/favicon.ico
235 Request: img.example.com/main.css
236 Request: img.example.com/sr.js
237 Request: example.betamarker.com/example.html
238 Request: www.lik-sang.com/Banners/bestsellers/skyscraper.php?likref=BSellers
239 Request: img.example.com/pb.png
240 Request: www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js crunch! (Blocked)
241 Request: www.advertising-department.com/ats/switch.ps.php?26856 crunch! (Blocked)
242 Request: img.example.com/p.gif
243 Request: www.popuptraffic.com/assign.php?l=example&mode=behind crunch! (Blocked)
244 Request: www.popuptraffic.com/scripts/popup.php?hid=5c3cf&tmpl=PBa.tmpl crunch! (Blocked)
245 Request: www.popuptraffic.com/assign.php?l=example crunch! (Blocked)
246 Request: www.lik-sang.com/Banners/best_sellers/best_sellers.css
247 Request: www.adtrak.net/adx.js crunch! (Blocked)
248 Request: img.example.com/hbg.gif
249 Request: img.example.com/example.jpg
250 Request: img.example.com/mt.png
251 Request: img.example.com/mm.png
252 Request: img.example.com/mb.png
253 Request: www.popuptraffic.com/scripts/popup.php?hid=a71b91fa5&tmpl=Ua.tmp crunch! (Blocked)
254 Request: www.example.com/tracker.js
255 Request: www.lik-sang.com/Banners/best_sellers/lsi_head.gif
256 Request: www.adtrak.net/adjs.php?n=020548130&what=zone:61 crunch! (Blocked)
257 Request: www.adtrak.net/adjs.php?n=463594413&what=zone:58&source=Ua crunch! (Blocked)
258 Request: www.lik-sang.com/Banners/best_sellers/bottomani.swf
259 Request: mmm.elitemediagroup.net/install.php?allowpop=no&popupmincook=0&allowsp2=1 crunch! (Blocked)
260 Request: www.example.com/tracker.js?screen=1400x1050&win=962x693
261 Request: www.adtrak.net/adlog.php?bannerid=1309&clientid=439&zoneid=61 crunch! (Blocked)
262 Request: 66.70.21.80/scripts/click.php?hid=5c3cf599a9efd0320d26&si
263 Request: 66.70.21.80/img/pixel.gif
264 Request: www.adtrak.net/adlog.php?bannerid=1309&clientid=439&zoneid=58&source=Ua&block=86400 crunch! (Blocked)
265 Request: 66.70.21.80/scripts/click.php?hid=a71b9f6504b0c5681fa5&si=Ua</PRE
270 > Despite 12 out of 32 requests being blocked, the page looked, and seemed to
271 behave perfectly <SPAN
274 > (minus some ads, of course).</P
282 >5.4. One of my favorite sites does not work with Privoxy.
286 > First verify that it is indeed a <SPAN
290 by toggling off <SPAN
294 HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/toggle"
296 >http://config.privoxy.org/toggle</A
298 (the toggle feature may need to be enabled in the main
303 and then shift-reloading the problem page (i.e. holding down the shift key
304 while clicking reload. Alternatively, flush your browser's disk and memory
307 > If the problem went away, we know we have a configuration related problem.
309 HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/show-url-info"
311 >http://config.privoxy.org/show-url-info</A
313 and paste the full URL of the page in question into the prompt. See which
314 actions are being applied to the URL, and which matches in which actions
315 files are responsible for that. It might be helpful also to look at your logs
316 for this site too, to see what else might be happening (note: logging may need
317 to be enabled in the main config file). Many sites are
318 complex and require a number of related pages to help present their content.
319 Look at what else might be used by the page in question, and what of that
327 Now, armed with this information, go to
329 HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/show-status"
331 >http://config.privoxy.org/show-status</A
333 and select the appropriate actions files for editing. </P
335 > You can now either look for a section which disables the actions that
336 you suspect to cause the problem and add a pattern for your site there,
337 or make up a completely new section for your site. In any case, the recommended
338 way is to disable only the prime suspect, reload the problem page, and only
339 if the problem persists, disable more and more actions until you have
340 identified the culprit. You may or may not want to turn the other actions
341 on again. Remember to flush your browser's caches in between any such changes!</P
343 > Alternately, if you are comfortable with a text editor, you can accomplish
344 the same thing by editing the appropriate actions file. Probably the easiest
345 way to deal with such problems when editing by hand is to add your
353 which is an alias that turns off most <SPAN
357 actions, but is also likely to turn off more actions then needed, and thus lower
358 your privacy and protection more than necessary,</P
360 > Troubleshooting actions is discussed in more detail in the <A
361 HREF="../user-manual/appendix.html#ACTIONSANAT"
363 >User Manual appendix,
364 Troubleshooting: the Anatomy of an Action</A
367 HREF="../user-manual/actions-file.html#ACT-EXAMPLES"
371 with general configuration information and examples.</P
373 > As a last resort, you can always see if your browser has a setting that will
374 bypass the proxy setting for selective sites. Modern browsers can do this.</P
382 >5.5. After installing Privoxy, I have to log in
383 every time I start IE. What gives?</A
386 > This is a quirk that affects the installation of
390 >, in conjunction with Internet Explorer and
391 Internet Connection Sharing on Windows 2000 and Windows XP. The symptoms may
392 appear to be corrupted or invalid DUN settings, or passwords.</P
394 > When setting up an NT based Windows system with
398 > you may find that things do not seem to be
399 doing what you expect. When you set your system up you will probably have set
400 up Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) with Dial up Networking (DUN) when
401 logged in with administrator privileges. You will probably have made this DUN
402 connection available to other accounts that you may have set-up on your
403 system. E.g. Mum or Dad sets up the system and makes accounts suitably
404 configured for the kids.</P
406 > When setting up <SPAN
409 > in this environment you
410 will have to alter the proxy set-up of Internet Explorer (IE) for the
411 specific DUN connection on which you wish to use
415 >. When you do this the ICS DUN set-up
416 becomes user specific. In this instance you will see no difference if you
417 change the DUN connection under the account used to set-up the connection.
418 However when you do this from another user you will notice that the DUN
419 connection changes to make available to "Me only". You will also find that
420 you have to store the password under each different user!</P
422 > The reason for this is that each user's set-up for IE is user specific. Each
423 set-up DUN connection and each LAN connection in IE store the settings for
424 each user individually. As such this enforces individual configurations
425 rather than common ones. Hence the first time you use a DUN connection after
426 re-booting your system it may not perform as you expect, and prompt you for
427 the password. Just set and save the password again and all should be OK.</P
429 >[Thanks to Ray Griffith for this submission.]</P
437 >5.6. I cannot connect to any FTP sites. Privoxy
444 > cannot act as a proxy for FTP traffic,
445 so do not configure your browser to use <SPAN
449 as an FTP proxy. The same is true for <SPAN
453 >any protocol other than HTTP
459 > Most browsers understand FTP as well as HTTP. If you connect to a site, with
462 >ftp://ftp.example.com</TT
463 >, your browser is making
464 an FTP connection, and not a HTTP connection. So while your browser may
468 > does not, and cannot proxy
472 > To complicate matters, some systems may have a generic <SPAN
476 setting, which will enable various protocols, including
483 > HTTP and FTP proxying! So it is possible to
484 accidentally enable FTP proxying in these cases. And of course, if this
488 > will indeed cause problems since
489 it does not know FTP. Newer version will give a sane error
490 message if a FTP connection is attempted. Just disable the FTP setting
491 and all will be well again.
497 > ever proxy FTP traffic? Unlikely.
498 There just is not much reason, and the work to make this happen is more than
508 >5.7. In Mac OS X, I can't configure Microsoft Internet Explorer to use
509 Privoxy as the HTTP proxy.</A
512 > Microsoft Internet Explorer (in versions like 5.1) respects system-wide
513 network settings. In order to change the HTTP proxy, open System
514 Preferences, and click on the Network icon. In the settings pane that
515 comes up, click on the Proxies tab. Ensure the "Web Proxy (HTTP)" checkbox
516 is checked and enter <TT
519 > in the entry field.
523 > in the Port field. The next time you start
524 IE, it should reflect these values.
532 NAME="MACOSXUNINSTALL"
533 >5.8. In Mac OS X, I dragged the Privoxy folder to the trash in order to
534 uninstall it. Now the finder tells me I don't have sufficient privileges to
538 > Note: This ONLY applies to privoxy 3.0.6 and earlier.
541 > Just dragging the <SPAN
544 > folder to the trash is
545 not enough to delete it. <SPAN
551 >uninstall.command</SPAN
552 > file that takes care of
553 these details. Open the trash, drag the <SPAN
555 >uninstall.command</SPAN
557 file out of the trash and double-click on it. You will be prompted for
558 confirmation and the administration password.
561 > The trash may still appear full after this command; emptying the trash
562 from the desktop should make it appear empty again.
571 >5.9. In Mac OS X Panther (10.3), images often fail to load and/or I
572 experience random delays in page loading. I'm using
576 > as my browser's proxy setting.</A
579 > We believe this is due to an IPv6-related bug in Mac OS X, but don't fully
580 understand the issue yet. In any case, changing the proxy setting to
588 works around the problem.
596 NAME="MACOSXACCOUNTDELETION"
597 >5.10. I just upgraded to Mac OS X 10.9 (Mavericks) and now <SPAN
604 > The upgrade process to Mac OS X Mavericks (10.9) from an earlier version of OS
605 X deletes all user accounts that are either not part of OS X itself or are
606 not interactive user accounts (ones you log in with). Since, for the sake of
610 > runs as a non-privileged user that is created by its
611 installer (_privoxy), it can no longer start up once that account gets deleted.
612 The solution is to perform a complete uninstall using the supplied
615 >uninstall.command</SPAN
616 > script (either back up your
617 configuration files or select to not have the uninstaller remove them when it
618 prompts you) and then reinstall <SPAN
621 > using the installer package and merge
622 in your configuration.
631 >5.11. My logs show many <SPAN
633 >"Unable to get my own hostname"</SPAN
641 > tries to get the hostname of the system
642 its running on from the IP address of the system interface it is bound to
653 > setting). If the system cannot supply
654 this information, <SPAN
657 > logs this condition.</P
659 > Typically, this would be considered a minor system configuration error. It is
660 not a fatal error to <SPAN
664 result in a much slower response from <SPAN
668 some platforms due to DNS timeouts.</P
670 > This can be caused by a problem with the local <TT
674 file. If this file has been changed from the original, try reverting it to
675 see if that helps. Make sure whatever name(s) are used for the local system,
676 that they resolve both ways.</P
678 > You should also be able to work around the problem with the
680 HREF="../user-manual/config.html#HOSTNAME"
691 >5.12. When I try to launch Privoxy, I get an
694 >"port 8118 is already in use"</SPAN
695 > (or similar wording).
706 > port. Typically this message would mean that there
707 is already one instance of <SPAN
711 your system is actually trying to start a second
715 > on the same port, which will not work.
716 (You can have multiple instances but they must be assigned different ports.)
717 How and why this might happen varies from platform to platform, but you need
718 to check your installation and start-up procedures.</P
726 >5.13. Pages with UTF-8 fonts are garbled.</A
729 > This may be the result of an overly aggressive filter. The filters that
730 are enabled in the default configuration aren't expected to cause problems
731 like this. If you enabled the <SPAN
735 try temporarily disabling it.</P
737 > If that doesn't help, temporarily disable all filters to see if another
738 filter could be the culprit. If the problem disappears, enable the filters
739 one by one, until the problem reappears and the offending filter is found.</P
741 > Once the problem-causing filter is known, it can be fixed or disabled.</P
746 >, or going to the most recent
750 > file available from <A
751 HREF="https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=11118"
755 might be worth a try, too.</P
763 >5.14. Why are binary files (such as images) corrupted when Privoxy
767 > This may also be caused by an (<A
768 HREF="trouble.html#DEMORONIZER"
771 > in conjunction with a web server that is misreporting the content
772 type. By default binary files are exempted from
777 (unless the web server by mistake says the file is something else).</P
785 >5.15. What is the <SPAN
788 > and why is it there?</A
791 > The original demoronizer was a Perl script that cleaned up HTML pages which
792 were created with certain Microsoft products. MS has used proprietary extensions
793 to standardized font encodings (ISO 8859-1), which has caused problems for pages
794 that are viewed with non-Microsoft products (and are expecting to see a
795 standard set of fonts). The demoronizer corrected these errors so the pages
796 displayed correctly. <SPAN
800 script, introducing a filter based on the original demoronizer, which in turn could
801 correct these errors on the fly.</P
803 > But this is only needed in some situations, and will cause serious problems in some
806 > If you are using Microsoft products, you do not need it. If you need to view
807 pages with UTF-8 characters (such as Cyrillic or Chinese), then it will
808 cause corruption of the fonts, and thus <SPAN
816 > On the other hand, if you use non-Microsoft products, and you occasionally
817 notice weird characters on pages, you might want to try it.</P
825 >5.16. Why do I keep seeing <SPAN
827 >"PrivoxyWindowOpen()"</SPAN
828 > in raw source code?</A
834 > is attempting to disable malicious
836 HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javascript"
840 in this case, with the <TT
842 >unsolicited-popups</TT
847 > cannot tell very well
851 > code snippets from <SPAN
856 > If you see this in HTML source, and the page displays without problems, then
857 this is good, and likely some pop-up window was disabled. If you see this
858 where it is causing a problem, such as a downloaded program source code file,
859 then you should set an exception for this site or page such that the
860 integrity of the page stays in tact by disabling all filtering.</P
868 >5.17. I am getting too many DNS errors like <SPAN
870 >"404 No Such Domain"</SPAN
872 can't Privoxy do this better?</A
875 > There are potentially several factors here. First of all, the DNS resolution
876 is done by the underlying operating system -- not
884 merely initiates the process and hands it off, and then later reports
885 whatever the outcome was and tries to give a coherent message if there seems
886 to be a problem. In some cases, this might otherwise be mitigated by the
887 browser itself which might try some work-arounds and alternate approaches (e.g
893 > In other cases, if <SPAN
897 with another proxy, this could complicate the issue, and cause undue
898 delays and timeouts. In the case of a <SPAN
902 server handles all the DNS. <SPAN
909 > which is reporting whatever problem occurred
910 downstream, and not the root cause of the error.</P
912 > In any case, versions newer than 3.0.3 include various improvements to help
916 > better handle these cases.</P
924 >5.18. At one site Privoxy just hangs, and starts taking
925 all CPU. Why is this?</A
928 > This is probably a manifestation of the <SPAN
932 occurs on pages containing many (thousands upon thousands) of blank lines. The blank lines
933 are in the raw HTML source of the page, and the browser just ignores them. But the
934 pattern matching in <SPAN
938 mechanism is trying to match against absurdly long strings and this becomes
939 very CPU-intensive, taking a long, long time to complete.</P
941 > Until a better solution comes along, disable filtering on these pages,
948 >unsolicited-popups</TT
949 > filters. If you run into this problem
953 > version, please send a problem report.</P
961 >5.19. I just installed Privoxy, and all my
962 browsing has slowed to a crawl. What gives?</A
965 > This should not happen, and for the overwhelming number of users world-wide,
966 it does not happen. I would suspect some inadvertent interaction of software
967 components such as anti-virus software, spyware protectors, personal
968 firewalls or similar components. Try disabling (or uninstalling) these one
969 at a time and see if that helps. Either way, if you are using a
973 > version, please report the problem.</P
981 >5.20. Why do my filters work on some sites but not on others?</A
984 > It's probably due to compression. It is a common practice for web servers to
985 send their content <SPAN
988 > in order to speed things up, and
989 then let the browser <SPAN
992 > them. When compiled with zlib support
996 > can decompress content before filtering, otherwise you may want to enable
998 HREF="../user-manual/actions-file.html#PREVENT-COMPRESSION"
1000 >prevent-compression</A
1006 > 3.0.9, zlib support is enabled in the default builds.</P
1014 >5.21. On some HTTPS sites my browser warns me about unauthenticated content,
1015 the URL bar doesn't get highlighted and the lock symbol appears to be broken.
1019 > Probably the browser is requesting ads through HTTPS and <SPAN
1023 is blocking the requests. Privoxy's error messages are delivered
1024 unencrypted and while it's obvious for the browser that the HTTPS
1025 request is already blocked by the proxy, some warn about unauthenticated
1028 > To work around the problem you can redirect those requests to an invalid
1029 local address instead of blocking them. While the redirects aren't
1030 encrypted either, many browsers don't care. They simply follow the
1031 redirect, fail to reach a server and display an error message instead
1034 > To do that, enable logging to figure out which requests get blocked by
1038 > and add the hosts (no path patterns) to a section like this:</P
1047 >{+redirect{http://127.0.0.1:0/} -block -limit-connect}
1048 .ivwbox.de:443/</PRE
1053 > Additionally you have to configure your browser to contact
1056 >"127.0.0.1:0"</SPAN
1057 > directly (instead of through <SPAN
1062 > To add a proxy exception in <SPAN
1064 >Mozilla Firefox</SPAN
1068 >"Preferences"</SPAN
1073 button located on the <SPAN
1080 section, and add <SPAN
1082 >"127.0.0.1:0"</SPAN
1085 >"No Proxy for:"</SPAN
1095 >5.22. I get selinux error messages. How can I fix this?</A
1098 > Please report the problem to the creator of your selinux policies.</P
1100 > The problem is that some selinux policy writers aren't familiar
1101 with the application they are trying to <SPAN
1105 thus create policies that make no sense.</P
1110 > case the problem usually
1111 is that the policy only allows outgoing connections for certain
1112 destination ports (e.g. 80 and 443). While this may cover the
1113 standard ports, websites occasionally use other ports as well.
1114 This isn't a security problem and therefore <SPAN
1118 default configuration doesn't block these requests.</P
1120 > If you really want to block these ports (and don't be able
1121 to load websites that don't use standard ports), you should
1122 configure Privoxy to block these ports as well, so it doesn't
1123 trigger the selinux warnings.</P
1130 NAME="GENTOO-RICERS"
1131 >5.23. I compiled <SPAN
1134 > with Gentoo's portage and it appears to be very slow. Why?</A
1137 > Probably you unintentionally compiled <SPAN
1140 > without threading support
1141 in which case requests have to be serialized and only one can be served
1142 at the same time.</P
1147 > flags and make sure they include
1151 >. If they don't, add the flag and rebuild <SPAN
1156 > If you compiled <SPAN
1159 > with threading support (on POSIX-based systems),
1162 >"Conditional #defines"</SPAN
1164 HREF="http://config.privoxy.org/show-status"
1166 >http://config.privoxy.org/show-status</A
1170 >"FEATURE_PTHREAD"</SPAN
1181 NAME="TAINTED-SOCKETS"
1182 >5.24. What are tainted sockets and how do I prevent them?</A
1188 > marks sockets as tainted when it can't use them to
1189 serve additional requests.
1190 This does not necessarily mean that something went wrong and
1191 information about tainted sockets is only logged if connection
1192 debugging is enabled (debug 2).</P
1194 > For example server sockets that were used for CONNECT requests
1195 (which are used to tunnel https:// requests) are considered tainted
1196 once the client closed its connection to <SPAN
1203 > could keep the connection to the server open,
1204 but the server would not accept requests that do not belong to the
1205 previous TLS/SSL session (and the client may even have terminated
1208 > Server sockets are also marked tainted when a client requests a
1209 resource, but closes the connection before <SPAN
1213 received (and forwarded) the resource to the client.
1214 In this case the server would (probably) accept additional requests,
1218 > could not get the response without completely reading
1219 the leftovers from the previous response.</P
1221 > These are just two examples, there are currently a bit more than
1222 25 scenarios in which a socket is considered tainted.</P
1224 > While sockets can also be marked tainted as a result of a technical
1225 problem that may be worth fixing, the problem will be explicitly
1233 NAME="PCRE-STACK-LIMIT"
1234 >5.25. After adding my custom filters, <SPAN
1237 > crashes when visitting certain websites</A
1240 > This can happen if your custom filters require more memory than <SPAN
1245 Usually the problem is that the operating system enforces a stack size limit
1246 that isn't sufficient.</P
1248 > Unless the problem occurs with the filters available in the default configuration,
1249 this is not considered a Privoxy bug.</P
1251 > To prevent the crashes you can rewrite your filter to use less ressources,
1252 increase the relevant memory limit or recompile pcre to use less stack space.
1253 For details please see the
1255 HREF="http://pcre.org/original/doc/html/pcrestack.html"
1257 >pcrestack man page</A
1259 and the documentation of your operating system.</P
1266 NAME="FILE-PERMISSIONS"
1267 >5.26. What to do if editing the config file of privoxy is access denied?</A
1270 > Your userid probably isn't allowed to edit the file.
1272 On Windows you can use the windows equivalent of sudo:</P
1281 >runas /user:administrator "notepad \privoxy\config.txt"</PRE
1286 > or fix the file permissions:</P
1295 >C:\Privoxy>icacls config.txt
1296 config.txt BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F)
1297 NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F)
1298 BUILTIN\Users:(I)(RX)
1299 NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(I)(M)
1301 Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
1303 C:\Privoxy>icacls config.txt /grant Lee:F
1304 processed file: config.txt
1305 Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
1307 C:\Privoxy>icacls config.txt
1308 config.txt I3668\Lee:(F)
1309 BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F)
1310 NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F)
1311 BUILTIN\Users:(I)(RX)
1312 NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(I)(M)
1314 Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
1316 C:\Privoxy></PRE
1321 > or try to point-n-click your way through adjusting the file
1322 permissions in windows explorer.</P
1330 SUMMARY="Footer navigation table"
1379 >Contacting the developers, Bug Reporting and Feature Requests</TD