From: Fabian Keil <fk@fabiankeil.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:32:20 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Discard ChangeLog entries from the previous release
X-Git-Tag: v_3_0_20~11
X-Git-Url: http://www.privoxy.org/gitweb/%22https:/developer-manual/static/faq/static/@default-cgi@toggle?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ce9a355cca433c4b6370c630830304f584e5f9ab;p=privoxy.git
Discard ChangeLog entries from the previous release
---
diff --git a/doc/webserver/user-manual/whatsnew.html b/doc/webserver/user-manual/whatsnew.html
index d9c7b2d2..ee02865b 100644
--- a/doc/webserver/user-manual/whatsnew.html
+++ b/doc/webserver/user-manual/whatsnew.html
@@ -858,52 +858,7 @@
following the pattern for Solaris, OS/2 and AmigaOS. Add
additional library-related settings to remove the need for
providing configure with custom LDFLAGS. Submitted by Simon South
- in #3574538. *** Version 3.0.19 Stable ***</p>
- </li>
- </ul>
- </li>
-
- <li>
- <p>Bug fixes:</p>
-
- <ul>
- <li>
- <p>Prevent a segmentation fault when de-chunking buffered
- content. It could be triggered by malicious web servers if
- Privoxy was configured to filter the content and running on a
- platform where SIZE_T_MAX isn't larger than UINT_MAX, which
- probably includes most 32-bit systems. On those platforms, all
- Privoxy versions before 3.0.19 appear to be affected. To be on
- the safe side, this bug should be presumed to allow code
- execution as proving that it doesn't seems unrealistic.</p>
- </li>
-
- <li>
- <p>Do not expect a response from the SOCKS4/4A server until it
- got something to respond to. This regression was introduced in
- 3.0.18 and prevented the SOCKS4/4A negotiation from working.
- Reported by qqqqqw in #3459781.</p>
- </li>
- </ul>
- </li>
-
- <li>
- <p>General improvements:</p>
-
- <ul>
- <li>
- <p>Fix an off-by-one in an error message about connect
- failures.</p>
- </li>
-
- <li>
- <p>Use a GNUMakefile variable for the webserver root directory
- and update the path. Sourceforge changed it which broke various
- web-related targets.</p>
- </li>
-
- <li>
- <p>Update the CODE_STATUS description.</p>
+ in #3574538.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>